Category Archives: Provincial

More homelessthan Atheletes in 2010

Can Vancouver’s Olympic pride be saved? First in a series.

View full article and comments here http:///News/2007/05/28/Homeless1/

By Monte Paulsen

Published: May 28, 2007

TheTyee.ca

“When the world arrives in Vancouver in 2010, what kind of city will they find?” asked Mayor Sam Sullivan in his inaugural address.

They will find a city in which there are more homeless Canadians shuffling in the shadow of BC Place than Olympic athletes parading inside the Vancouver stadium.

That’s the conclusion of a three-month investigation by The Tyee, which found that unless Mayor Sullivan and B.C. Premier Gordon Campbell radically reshape their response to North America’s fastest-growing homelessness crisis, the number of Greater Vancouver homeless will easily exceed the 5,000 athletes and officials expected to participate in the 2010 games.

And it could get worse. If affordable housing continues to erode throughout the region at the rate it has during Vancouver’s recent SRO buying binge, there could be twice that many. Should that happen, there would be one homeless person for each of the 10,000 members of the international press corps expected to encamp at the new $800 million Vancouver Convention and Exhibition Centre.

During the coming days, The Tyee will publish articles that explain:

  1. How the sudden loss of Vancouver’s residential hotels accelerated a crisis that had been growing since Gordon Campbell’s BC Liberals slashed welfare benefits
  2. Why Housing Minister Rich Coleman’s bold expenditure of more than $100 million provincial tax dollars will deliver very little additional housing
  3. How local and provincial taxpayers could wind up spending more money taking care of the homeless than building Olympic venues
  4. Why Mayor Sullivan’s elaborate plan to privatize social housing is an untimely gambit that appears to have distracted his administration during a pivotal time
  5. Where neighbourhood NIMBY groups have stalled the construction of sorely needed supportive housing
  6. What governments, business, non-profits and Olympic organizers must do this year in order for Canada to avoid a lasting legacy of shame in the wake of the 2010 Winter Games

Today: A look at the numbers.

Over 2,200 homeless now

On March 15, 2005, a team of social workers counted 2,174 homeless people in Greater Vancouver.

Starting at 5:30 in the morning, they scoured shelters, drop-in centres, parks, and other locations frequented by the homeless to produce The 2005 Greater Vancouver Homeless Count. The total number of homeless doubled since the previous count in 2002, from 1,121 to 2,174. More than half (1,291) were found within the City of Vancouver, followed by Surrey (371) and New Westminster (92). (A map of their findings is here.)

“All counts underestimate homelessness, because of the difficulty in finding those who do not use services or spend time where homeless people congregate,” wrote the report’s authors. Also, the one-day count did not consider people sleeping in detox facilities, recovery houses, hospitals or sofa surfers — even though many of those residents have no fixed address. “Thus, the Homeless Count did not enumerate every homeless person in the region on March 15, 2005, and is an undercount.”

But while the report does not claim to offer a complete count of homelessness, it does provide an accurate survey of the region’s homeless population. Among its findings:

More homeless people were found on streets than in shelters; the number of street homeless rose by 235 per cent since 2002.

People of Aboriginal identity accounted for 30 per cent of the region’s homeless population, while making up only two per cent of the total population.

When asked why they were homeless, 44 per cent cited lack of income, 25 per cent named addiction or other health conditions, and 22 per cent blamed the high cost of housing in Greater Vancouver.

Less than half of those counted had a steady income source. The rest survived on income from panhandling, bottle collecting, casual employment, or illegal activities.

Nearly three quarters reported chronic health conditions, such as addiction, mental illness or physical disability. Addiction was the most common; almost half of the homeless who responded to this question reported problems with addiction.

When asked which municipality they considered their last permanent home, 75 per cent reported somewhere in Greater Vancouver. Another 8 per cent reported their last permanent home was elsewhere in B.C., 15 per cent reported a location elsewhere in Canada, and one per cent reported a location outside Canada.

The next Greater Vancouver count will be conducted in 2008.

‘Unprecedented demand’

Local counts have found higher numbers of homeless.

Judy Graves coordinates the Vancouver Housing Centre’s award-winning tenant assistance program. She’s worked in the Downtown Eastside since 1979, and has spent much of the last decade trolling the city’s streets, parks and alleys for people in need of housing.

Graves conducted her own count in 2005. Using the same methodology biologists use to count wildlife, she found up to twice the number of Vancouver street homeless enumerated in the one-day count. Her next report is due late this fall.

“There are a couple of neighbourhoods in the City of Vancouver where I believe we’re seeing a decrease in the number who live outside overnight,” Graves said. “In other neighbourhoods, especially outside of the urban core, we’re seeing quite an increase in the number of homeless on the street.”

The undercount may be even more dramatic in smaller communities. Like most suburban municipalities, Port Coquitlam has no service center at which homeless people would congregate. Not surprisingly, the 2003 regional count was able to locate a mere 10 homeless people in PoCo, and the 2005 count found only 35.

Then, last summer, a new service organization began working in the area. Within months, the group had identified 177 homeless in PoCo.

“I think the situation is comparable in Burnaby and Surrey,” said Diane Thorne, an MLA who represents the Coquitlam-Maillardville riding and also serves as housing critic for the New Democratic Party. She estimated that the actual homeless population in Greater Vancouver’s suburban communities is “10 times” the 2005 count.

Thorne noted that B.C. does not conduct a province-wide homeless count. The best available statistic is that between October 2005 and April 2006 a record 28,922 people were turned away from B.C. shelters.

“There is an unprecedented demand for shelter services, not only in Vancouver but across the province,” Thorne said. “There have been enormous increases in long-term and repeat users.”

Disappearing rooms

Anecdotal evidence also suggests that the Vancouver homeless epidemic is deeper than the 2005 numbers suggests.

“Rooming houses and hotels are falling like flies,” said Jean Swanson, a veteran Downtown Eastside activist now with the Carnegie Community Action Project.

Twenty-two residential hotels were sold in 2006, with a combined total of 1,178 rooms. By adding the number of rooms from which tenants were evicted to the number from which tenants were forced out by rising rates, Swanson counts 600 low-income rooms lost during the same year.

“If we lose 600 more this year, another 600 in 2008, and 600 again in 2009, that’s 2,400 units of low-income housing likely to vanish before the Olympics,” Swanson figured.

Likewise, intake workers at social housing centres report much longer waiting lists.

“It’s just depressing,” said Mark Townsend, who directs the Portland Hotel Society. “You feel like Solomon cutting up the baby, yeah? Shall you take this guy who’s a problem tenant and no one will have him, or that one who’s in a wheelchair and stuck somewhere?”

“We have just flat run out of empty rooms in Vancouver,” Graves agreed. “We’re at zero vacancy rate in those little rooms that were the last housing refuge for people. Anybody who’s in the street now is going to have a precious hard time finding a place to go.”

Homeless shelters are overflowing, despite the addition of 181 new shelter beds since 2000. The Downtown Eastside Women’s Centre, a daytime drop-in facility, was pressed into service as an emergency shelter last November — and an average of 50 women continue to sleep there every night.

And outreach workers are reporting more rough sleepers. The Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users, which operates nightly street patrols, is not only seeing more addicts on the streets, but is losing its own members to homelessness as well. Whereas only one-tenth of its members were without shelter as recently as 2002, now one-quarter of Vandu members are homeless.

“It’s more dire, for sure,” Townsend said. “Much more dire.”

More homeless than athletes

After more than a dozen interviews with these and other housing experts, The Tyee has concluded that unless the city and province begin construction of additional supportive housing this year, there will be an estimated 5,600 homeless people living in Greater Vancouver by 2010.

There are two components of this projection:

  1. The Vancouver count will triple to 3,800. In the fall of 2006, Pivot Legal Society forecast that Vancouver homelessness will triple by 2010. No credible rebuttal to that forecast has emerged. And after weighing the number of new units BC Housing currently plans to open in the next few years against the accelerating loss of existing SRO rooms, The Tyee concluded that the zero vacancy rate will remain and Vancouver’s most vulnerable residents will continue to be displaced.
  2. The regional count will roughly double to 2,000. It appears likely that the 2005 snapshot undercounted suburban homelessness by a greater margin than it did Vancouver. Also, as part of anti-drug efforts, some suburban municipalities continue to raze drug houses, bulldozing affordable housing in the bargain.

Swanson, Thorne and a few others regard The Tyee’s projection as too low.

“If the attack on the rooming houses continues, I think we’ll see much more than that in Vancouver,” Swanson said.

“I expect regional homelessness to triple, at a minimum,” MLA Thorne predicted. “I hope I’m wrong about that.”

Graves, Townsend and others thought the number was accurate, or a bit high. Graves offered perspective.

“As recently as 15 years ago, there was no street homelessness in Vancouver. We did have shelters. We did have the odd coot,” Graves said. She believes that Vancouver could vanquish homelessness again — within a few short years — if political leaders made it a priority.

“The causes of homelessness are complex,” Graves said. “But the solution is kindergarten simple: Build supportive housing.”

Related Tyee stories:

Monte Paulsen is a contributing editor at The Tyee.

10,000 Homeless in BC

Abbotsford tops list of boomtowns plagued by poverty.

View full article and comments here http:///News/2007/11/30/HomelessCount/

By Monte Paulsen

Published: November 30, 2007

TheTyee.ca

More than 10,580 British Columbians are homeless this winter, according to a survey of estimates compiled by the New Democratic Party. And the ranks of the unsheltered are growing fastest not in the province’s largest cities, but in B.C.’s booming exurbs such as Abbotsford and Whistler.

“We are sometimes fooled into thinking homelessness is a Vancouver issue,” said MLA David Chudnovsky, the opposition critic who conducted the study. “But these numbers show that homelessness is a province-wide crisis.”

Interviews with social workers and homeless individuals in the Fraser Valley confirm the NDP’s findings.

“Smaller communities are starting to face this issue,” said Deb Lowell, a spokeswoman for The Salvation Army in Abbotsford. “Homelessness now seems to be a problem right across the province, if not the country.”

Ken Wiede is an Abbotsford native who lived without a home in his own hometown for two years.

“There’s way more people living on the streets of Abbotsford today,” Wiede said. “Way more. And it’s rougher.”

Shelter staff supplied estimates

B.C.’s largest cities top the list released Friday morning. The NDP found 2,300 people living without shelter in Vancouver, 1,550 in Victoria and 1,050 in Prince George.

But the second tier of homelessness is concentrated in fast-growing exurbs such as Abbotsford, which ranked fourth on the list.

The survey estimated there are 400 homeless people living in Abbotsford, and another 184 across the Upper Fraser Valley. Similarly, the survey found 200 homeless in the Tri Cities, 180 in Burnaby and 100 in Langley.

Taken together, the NDP estimates suggest that there are now more homeless Canadians scattered across the Lower Mainland than concentrated in Vancouver’s notorious Downtown Eastside.

“I was particularly surprised by the large numbers of suburban homelessness,” MLA Chudnovsky said. “These include some of the most affluent and fastest-growing parts of the province.”

Chudnovsky said he initiated the survey after Housing Minister Rich Coleman failed to respond to his request for an official province-wide homeless count.

“If we’re serious about ending homelessness, we need to know what the situation really is,” Chudnovsky said. “Minister Coleman either did not know, or was not willing to share that information. So we gathered it ourselves.”

Field counts were cited where available. For communities without such counts, Chudnovsky’s team interviewed social workers with client lists — people such as shelter operators and outreach staff — and compiled the province-wide total from their local estimates.

‘We don’t have SROs in Abbotsford’

“In Abbotsford, we have what economists would call an ideal economy: High wages. Low unemployment. Affordable living,” said Ron Van Wyc, program director for B.C.’s Mennonite Central Committee. “So for a long time, I think there was a public perception that we didn’t have a homeless problem here.”

That perception weakened after a 2004 field count found 226 homeless people, and cracked in 2006 after a group of local homeless people crowded into a high-profile encampment that became know as Compassion Park.

“As a community, I think we’ve moved through the phase of denial,” Van Wyc said. “Now there is a recognition that something needs to be done.”

Leading the charge across B.C.’s bible belt is The Salvation Army. In Abbotsford, the Army’s Centre of Hope houses a 150-meal-a-day soup kitchen, a 20-bed shelter, a 14-bed transitional housing facility and a provincially-funded outreach program.

Outreach worker Randy Clayton said he could house more than half of the almost 300 people on Abbotsford’s outreach rolls — if only he could find enough affordable apartments.

“We don’t have SROs in Abbotsford,” Clayton said. “There are a few rooming houses that let bedrooms for $400 or $500 a month. One-bedroom basement suites start at $700.” But with the province still paying only $375 a month for housing, “There’s really no affordable housing to be had.”

Forest dwellers

Most of Clayton’s clients live in the woods. Some pitch full camps complete with kitchens and fire pits. Others nest in local parks. One former military man dug himself a burrow ten feet underground.

Others live in their cars. In a region with poor public transit, many of the working poor choose to give up their homes before sacrificing their wheels.

“I had a beat-up old Chevy van that I lived in for three years,” said Wiede. He found places that tolerated parking overnight. “They never gave me permission,” he said. “But they never kicked me out.”

Clayton figures there are another 100 to 150 homeless individuals who remain off the Sally Ann’s rolls, bringing the Abbotsford total in line with the NDP estimate.

“This is the time of year that we find out how many more are homeless,” Clayton said. “When it gets cold like this, people literally come out of the woods looking to get warm.”

‘Too cold in 100 Mile’

There does not appear to be any single reason why homelessness has roughly doubled throughout the Lower Mainland in the past few years.

A bit more than half of Abbotsford’s homeless are locals, according to the 2004 homeless count. Many of those were pushed into the streets by the same deinstitutionalization and addiction that have driven the homeless crisis across Canada.

“I think we are seeing the consequence of social policy decisions made 15 years ago,” Van Wyc said, “when there was a decision made to not continue funding social housing.”

The other half of Abbotsford’s burgeoning homeless appears to come from elsewhere in B.C.

Clayton Fraser is a thickly bearded young man who said he’d slept on the streets of Vancouver, beneath the power lines of Surrey, and “in the ditch” as far north as 100 Mile House. He did not beat around the bush when asked why he prefers Abbotsford, where he’s spent most of the past year sleeping in a park.

“Too many games on Hastings Street. Too cold in 100 Mile,” Fraser said.

‘Anywhere but Vancouver’

Wiede said that many of the “new crowd” who arrived within the past year are from Vancouver.

“It’s like a wave,” Wiede said. “It’s getting tougher in Vancouver. And now some of those tough people are moving here.”

Randy Clayton’s phone rang during our interview. On the other end of the line was a woman from Aldergrove seeking information about shelters. The outreach worker pulled a photocopied list off the wall, and started reading her some place names and phone numbers.

She interrupted him to explain that she was willing to go, “anywhere but Vancouver.”

Few facilities in small cities

B.C.’s suburbs and small towns are less prepared to cope with fast-growing homeless populations than are cities such as Vancouver and Victoria, which host a continuum of services ranging from detox clinics to long-term supportive housing.

“There are few facilities here. The infrastructure is not as well established as in a place like Vancouver,” Van Wyc said.

Similarly, the City of Abbotsford does not own any land on which to build new facilities, and is therefore unable to take advantage of funding recently offered by the province.

A new hospital is under construction, and Abbotsford housing advocates are lobbying to convert the old building into new social housing. Van Wyc is also pondering whether some sort of a mobile home park might be pressed into service in the interim.

But while the causes and conditions of homelessness vary among urban and suburban areas, the solution appears to remain the same: provide stable homes.

Blindness of ‘untrained eyes’

Wiede is among Abbotsford’s success stories. Unable to work after a back injury, and unable to survive on a $600-a-month pension, Wiede slipped into homelessness at the age of 60. He “wandered around this area” for two years before landing a room at Centre of Hope’s transitional housing.

“The Salvation Army really helped me out in a big way,” Wiede said. “They took me in when there was no place I could go.”

Wiede has since found a subsidized apartment across town, and has largely re-entered mainstream society. But his two years on the streets opened his eyes to a problem he said most of his new neighbours still can’t see.

“I see things my friend doesn’t see,” Wiede said. “We’ll be drivin’ along and I’ll say, ‘Did you see those eight people in the field over there?’ And he says, ‘No.’

“And you see, that’s just it. With untrained eyes, you don’t see it. And if you don’t see it, you think the problem doesn’t exist.”

Related Tyee stories:

Monte Paulsen is investigative editor of The Tyee. He welcomes e-mail and encourages respectful comment in the forum below

10,000 Homeless in BC

Abbotsford tops list of boomtowns plagued by poverty.

View full article and comments here http:///News/2007/11/30/HomelessCount/

By Monte Paulsen

Published: November 30, 2007

TheTyee.ca

More than 10,580 British Columbians are homeless this winter, according to a survey of estimates compiled by the New Democratic Party. And the ranks of the unsheltered are growing fastest not in the province’s largest cities, but in B.C.’s booming exurbs such as Abbotsford and Whistler.

“We are sometimes fooled into thinking homelessness is a Vancouver issue,” said MLA David Chudnovsky, the opposition critic who conducted the study. “But these numbers show that homelessness is a province-wide crisis.”

Interviews with social workers and homeless individuals in the Fraser Valley confirm the NDP’s findings.

“Smaller communities are starting to face this issue,” said Deb Lowell, a spokeswoman for The Salvation Army in Abbotsford. “Homelessness now seems to be a problem right across the province, if not the country.”

Ken Wiede is an Abbotsford native who lived without a home in his own hometown for two years.

“There’s way more people living on the streets of Abbotsford today,” Wiede said. “Way more. And it’s rougher.”

Shelter staff supplied estimates

B.C.’s largest cities top the list released Friday morning. The NDP found 2,300 people living without shelter in Vancouver, 1,550 in Victoria and 1,050 in Prince George.

But the second tier of homelessness is concentrated in fast-growing exurbs such as Abbotsford, which ranked fourth on the list.

The survey estimated there are 400 homeless people living in Abbotsford, and another 184 across the Upper Fraser Valley. Similarly, the survey found 200 homeless in the Tri Cities, 180 in Burnaby and 100 in Langley.

Taken together, the NDP estimates suggest that there are now more homeless Canadians scattered across the Lower Mainland than concentrated in Vancouver’s notorious Downtown Eastside.

“I was particularly surprised by the large numbers of suburban homelessness,” MLA Chudnovsky said. “These include some of the most affluent and fastest-growing parts of the province.”

Chudnovsky said he initiated the survey after Housing Minister Rich Coleman failed to respond to his request for an official province-wide homeless count.

“If we’re serious about ending homelessness, we need to know what the situation really is,” Chudnovsky said. “Minister Coleman either did not know, or was not willing to share that information. So we gathered it ourselves.”

Field counts were cited where available. For communities without such counts, Chudnovsky’s team interviewed social workers with client lists — people such as shelter operators and outreach staff — and compiled the province-wide total from their local estimates.

‘We don’t have SROs in Abbotsford’

“In Abbotsford, we have what economists would call an ideal economy: High wages. Low unemployment. Affordable living,” said Ron Van Wyc, program director for B.C.’s Mennonite Central Committee. “So for a long time, I think there was a public perception that we didn’t have a homeless problem here.”

That perception weakened after a 2004 field count found 226 homeless people, and cracked in 2006 after a group of local homeless people crowded into a high-profile encampment that became know as Compassion Park.

“As a community, I think we’ve moved through the phase of denial,” Van Wyc said. “Now there is a recognition that something needs to be done.”

Leading the charge across B.C.’s bible belt is The Salvation Army. In Abbotsford, the Army’s Centre of Hope houses a 150-meal-a-day soup kitchen, a 20-bed shelter, a 14-bed transitional housing facility and a provincially-funded outreach program.

Outreach worker Randy Clayton said he could house more than half of the almost 300 people on Abbotsford’s outreach rolls — if only he could find enough affordable apartments.

“We don’t have SROs in Abbotsford,” Clayton said. “There are a few rooming houses that let bedrooms for $400 or $500 a month. One-bedroom basement suites start at $700.” But with the province still paying only $375 a month for housing, “There’s really no affordable housing to be had.”

Forest dwellers

Most of Clayton’s clients live in the woods. Some pitch full camps complete with kitchens and fire pits. Others nest in local parks. One former military man dug himself a burrow ten feet underground.

Others live in their cars. In a region with poor public transit, many of the working poor choose to give up their homes before sacrificing their wheels.

“I had a beat-up old Chevy van that I lived in for three years,” said Wiede. He found places that tolerated parking overnight. “They never gave me permission,” he said. “But they never kicked me out.”

Clayton figures there are another 100 to 150 homeless individuals who remain off the Sally Ann’s rolls, bringing the Abbotsford total in line with the NDP estimate.

“This is the time of year that we find out how many more are homeless,” Clayton said. “When it gets cold like this, people literally come out of the woods looking to get warm.”

‘Too cold in 100 Mile’

There does not appear to be any single reason why homelessness has roughly doubled throughout the Lower Mainland in the past few years.

A bit more than half of Abbotsford’s homeless are locals, according to the 2004 homeless count. Many of those were pushed into the streets by the same deinstitutionalization and addiction that have driven the homeless crisis across Canada.

“I think we are seeing the consequence of social policy decisions made 15 years ago,” Van Wyc said, “when there was a decision made to not continue funding social housing.”

The other half of Abbotsford’s burgeoning homeless appears to come from elsewhere in B.C.

Clayton Fraser is a thickly bearded young man who said he’d slept on the streets of Vancouver, beneath the power lines of Surrey, and “in the ditch” as far north as 100 Mile House. He did not beat around the bush when asked why he prefers Abbotsford, where he’s spent most of the past year sleeping in a park.

“Too many games on Hastings Street. Too cold in 100 Mile,” Fraser said.

‘Anywhere but Vancouver’

Wiede said that many of the “new crowd” who arrived within the past year are from Vancouver.

“It’s like a wave,” Wiede said. “It’s getting tougher in Vancouver. And now some of those tough people are moving here.”

Randy Clayton’s phone rang during our interview. On the other end of the line was a woman from Aldergrove seeking information about shelters. The outreach worker pulled a photocopied list off the wall, and started reading her some place names and phone numbers.

She interrupted him to explain that she was willing to go, “anywhere but Vancouver.”

Few facilities in small cities

B.C.’s suburbs and small towns are less prepared to cope with fast-growing homeless populations than are cities such as Vancouver and Victoria, which host a continuum of services ranging from detox clinics to long-term supportive housing.

“There are few facilities here. The infrastructure is not as well established as in a place like Vancouver,” Van Wyc said.

Similarly, the City of Abbotsford does not own any land on which to build new facilities, and is therefore unable to take advantage of funding recently offered by the province.

A new hospital is under construction, and Abbotsford housing advocates are lobbying to convert the old building into new social housing. Van Wyc is also pondering whether some sort of a mobile home park might be pressed into service in the interim.

But while the causes and conditions of homelessness vary among urban and suburban areas, the solution appears to remain the same: provide stable homes.

Blindness of ‘untrained eyes’

Wiede is among Abbotsford’s success stories. Unable to work after a back injury, and unable to survive on a $600-a-month pension, Wiede slipped into homelessness at the age of 60. He “wandered around this area” for two years before landing a room at Centre of Hope’s transitional housing.

“The Salvation Army really helped me out in a big way,” Wiede said. “They took me in when there was no place I could go.”

Wiede has since found a subsidized apartment across town, and has largely re-entered mainstream society. But his two years on the streets opened his eyes to a problem he said most of his new neighbours still can’t see.

“I see things my friend doesn’t see,” Wiede said. “We’ll be drivin’ along and I’ll say, ‘Did you see those eight people in the field over there?’ And he says, ‘No.’

“And you see, that’s just it. With untrained eyes, you don’t see it. And if you don’t see it, you think the problem doesn’t exist.”

Related Tyee stories:

Monte Paulsen is investigative editor of The Tyee.

.

This series about the roots of homelessness and possible solutions in B.C. is funded in part by the Tides Canada Foundation

Transit Forum

I was at the transit forum Wednesday evening, January 23rd.

The audience was solidly in favour of a light rail system out to Chilliwack along the old valley transit lines. The only problem, a rather large problem, is that this is not the philosophy of the provincial government which would rather increase the traffic struggling into Vancouver. Hopefully the provincial government, particularly Transport Minister Kevin Falcon, will open their ears to listen to common sense.

And no, making that statement is not a result of using mind altering substances. With changing economic circumstances reality can only be denied for so long. Maybe I should have said – hopefully before it is to late ….

The bad news is that it was made clear that the province requires “partnerships” if municipalities wish provincial funds for projects. What that mean is that cities must be willing to invest/spend their own money on any project they seek provincial funds on.

This “put your money where your mouth is” policy is not unreasonable, even though it unfortunately bodes ill for Abbotsford in getting provincial funding. I say bodes ill because with the financial debt burden city hall has assumed with Plan A, there is not likely going to be any funds available to “partner” with the provincial government.

Leaving infrastructure unbuilt and provincial funds not coming to Abbotsford thus rendering the “legacy” of Plan A all the missed opportunities for provincial funds and needed infrastructure unbuilt.

I do have one suggestion for a novel approach by Abbotsford city hall to transit planning vis-à-vis the ever lengthening commute to work in Vancouver – attract business and good, well-paying jobs to Abbotsford. I know this is a major policy and behaviour change – to encourage rather than discouraging and not raising barriers to businesses bringing jobs to Abbotsford.

Who knows, such a rational response may even penetrate the provincial government and encourage them to think and plan about commuting and traffic flow rather than blindly slapping down more highways and byways.

You know you might be an Ideologue if …

… Your first reaction to a report from your own handpicked advisers is to make excuses rather than consider and address the issues they highlight as needing action. Exactly what happened with the report released December 13, 2007.

The BC Progress Board – 18 business executives and academic leaders handpicked by Gordon Campbell – named BC the second-worst province in the country on a number of social indicators.

“The most troubling social indicator is the proportion of British Columbians living below the low-income threshold,” says the report, which calls the social condition category “one of the most compelling considerations” for judging a society.

The report says the proportion of people living on low incomes in B.C. has been greater than other provinces through much of the past decade.

The government’s response came in the form of Minister of Employment and Income Assistance Claude Richmond making excuses and offering explanations of why the board was wrong. Together with the old political standby, vague promises that the government will take the report seriously and see where improvements can be made.

It is this type of “what problem, I don’t see a problem, sorry not in my ideological world view”, non-responses that explain why this is the second year in a row for BC’s unacceptable rating and position on the list. As long as the man at the wheel sees only what his ideology allows him to perceive, excuses and denial will be the response to issues lying in the blind spots imposed by ideology.

Mr. Campbell needs to ponder the words of Robert Frost, or if preferred, George Bernard Shaw.

Mr. Frost warned that donning the blinders of purpose will, like the blinders on a horse, inevitably lead to narrowness of point of view. Mr. Shaw cautioned that the moment we WANT to believe something, one becomes blind to arguments against it.

If Mr. Campbell fails to shed his ideological blinders, stop making excuses, listen to his own hand-picked experts and address the social issues existing in our cities and province …… his hand-picked Progress Board will continue, year after year, to find increasing social problems and inequities.

If you are going to hand-pick experts to report, it would be prudent to listen to them and address the issues they bring forward as requiring attention.

Rather than blindly saying “Neigh”.

Gordon Campbell – Ideologue?

Having a firmly held world view based on one’s Ideology is like travelling through life and the world around you wearing a set of blinders. It narrows your vision down to tunnel vision, denying one a full and true view of the real world existing around you.

It is this narrowness of vision that can result in the ideologue being taken by surprise by things such as homeless and addiction issues, a mistake-prone child protection system, the B.C. Lotteries scandal. It can lead to a management style where the Ideologue keeps the reins firmly in his hands because he is the keeper of THE VISION. At some point you begin to lose valuable people because of this interferrence. You also lose some of your best people because your Ideology blinds you to issues they see as important.

Labour Minister Olga Ilich’s unhappiness manifested itself in her confirmation that she wouldn’t be seeking re-election. Finance Minister Carole Taylor is also leaving, with reports saying she’s grown tired of Campbell’s managing style and his refusal to see and deal with social issues of concern to her.

I read with interest a piece by Keith Baldrey about Campbell and recent events which included his evaluation that Campbell is “… incredibly well-versed in all sorts of issues, and can talk knowledgeably about everything from forestry to health care and climate change.” Undoubtably Mr. Campbell would agree with this statement – as would many others.

Therein lies a major problem, perhaps the major problem, with and for Campbell and his Liberals. An Ideologue is well-versed and knowledgable within the framework of his Ideology. If the reality of the causes and solutions of issues lies outside his ideology, an ideologue will find causes/explainations that fit within his world view. The problem is that solutions based on addressing the wrong causatity factors cannot suceed in bringing about the outcomes needed to address the issues. This is particularily true in many of the social issues because at their root lies people, giving rise to very chaotic cause/effect/solutions conditions.

I see the results of this clash between BC Liberal Ideology and reality daily – increasing numbers of homeless that include seniors and families; increasingly unaffordable housing; wage levels that even at full time, people cannot live on; increases in those sufferring mental illness and addiction ending up homeless and on our streets; poverty etc. Social problems that do not lend themselves, or the methods for addressing them, to ANY ideology. These types of issues have to be addressed based on the way they are, their reality, not upon how we want them to be.

Mr. Baldrey may be correct that their ” …continual lead in popularity has allowed the Liberals to retain a lofty air of arrogance…” I am not totally agreement with his conclusion that this lead ” ….has prevented them from realizing a pattern of problems may be developing.”

Undoubtably popularitity, success and arrogance can/will cause one to miss developing problems. However it seems to me that many of the developing and growing problems that face the BC government are growing in the blind spots caused by Campbell’s and the Liberal Party’s Ideological blinders.

One can only hope that if Campbell and the Liberals begin to worry about re-election, it may give those in the party with a wider, non-ridgid worldview an opportunity to cause Campbell and collegues to remove their Ideological blinders.

Transportation Minister Kevin Falcon’s response? non-response? to a Memo.

Transportation Minister Kevin Falcon’s response time on a matter of bridge infrastructure concern was truly impressive. I had sent him a memo raising concerns about drainage and leakage of bridge structures in Abbotsford and less than 2 weeks later workers were to be found making repairs to the drainage system.

I just do not know whether to laugh uproariously or hang my head and cry in despair.

After the snowfall that turned to a downpour I sent Minster Falcon a memo about the difficulties caused the homeless by the bad drainage and massive leakage noting the need to “remove the threat posed to the health and lives forced to live beneath the bridges, like trolls from the dark-ages tales”.

I did note that “we at homelessinabbotsford.com would rather see these needs address in the proper manner and ministry, as opposed to continuing to sweep the problem under the bridges – and whatever makeshift shelter can be found.” I suggested that as an alternative to repairs he could speak to Claude Richmond (Minister of Employment and Income Assistance), Housing Minister Rich Coleman or Premier Gordon Campbell and get changes made to the policies that result in BC citizens living under the provinces bridges.

Based on the swift repair to the drainage system it would appear that it is the BC Liberal government’s policy that BC citizens reside under bridges.

Leaving us to ponder whether the $500,000,000 pursuing these polices costs taxpayers, would not be spent on housing and recovery support programs which would reduce the yearly costs and result in significant savings to taxpayers?