Blessings

Climbing out of the car into the brisk cold of the evening air served as a crisp reminder that it has been an unusually snowy and cold winter.

As a result of the snow and cold the extreme weather protocols for the opening of extra beds for the homeless have been in effect most nights since the beginning of December.

The consequence for the local churches that signed on to provide extra beds in December (Grace Church), January (Seven Oaks Alliance) and February (Emmanuel Mennonite Church) was the need to be open most of the nights in the month they were covering. These churches have also stepped in to provide beds for our continued unseasonable weather this March.

Thank you, it was and is much appreciated.

A Thank You needs also be extended to Faith Bible Church and all the volunteers who stepped in to provide a sheltered place for the Thursday night barbeque to be held. Shiver. A very warm Thank You.

Again Thank you, it was and is much appreciated.

Then there is Pastor Andy Kwak and his magnificent Sunday Brunch together with the usual suspects: the folks of the Calvin Tuesday dinner, the FVCC with music and a meal on Friday night, the good people of the Sunday blue bus and the ever popular pancake breakfast at the APA.

Thank You all.

“The right thing to do”? I don’t think so.

On the front page of Tuesday March 10’s Abbotsford Times (story below) there was a picture of the City’s latest homeless victim and a story mindlessly parroting the City’s media spin, but there was no comment from the City’s victim himself nor were any of the obvious questions asked of the Orwellian horde from the City.

“This is an individual who very clearly needs help.” So they ‘helped’ him by destroying his home leaving him out on the streets with the clothes on his back facing a night that the weather reports called for snow and a string of subzero temperature days and nights. Then claim “This was the right thing to do.” No it was not – if you treated a dog that way the SPCA would be hauling you into court.

For the record: the City was informed that this individual was not ready to come inside and would relocate to another camp site if displaced – no matter how life threatening the weather was.

I had spoken to the victim Friday to enquire as to whether there was something I could do to help ensure his survival. I spoke to him again on Tuesday because I felt it only fair to get his input before I wrote about the reality, not the City’s spin or pabulum, of what took place on Friday.

His evaluation of the Times reporting of Friday’s events was pithy, consisting of two four letter words; the first word beginning with B*** ***T and the second word ending with T. He then proceeded to ask several of the questions that should have been asked of the police or the City’s spin doctor – Katherine Jeffcoatt, manager of communications and marketing.

If the police were so worried about the “…health of the individual.” why were they turning him out of his home into weather predicted to include snow and that has been setting low temperature records in the province knowing this person would not come inside but would seek out another place to camp?

He wished Ms Jeffcoatt to explain to him what was “compassionate” or “respectful” in destroying his home, carting away his belongings and leaving him without his shelter in life threatening weather? He found statements by the City about the availability of social services laughable. I again draw to the readers attention the fact that the City had been informed that this individual would not avail himself of social services.

He found Ms Jeffcoatt’s comment about “…how vulnerable homeless people are in our community.” to be highly ironic in light of the fact that it is the City and their police who repeatedly take advantage of that vulnerability to abuse or violate the rights and dignity of the homeless.

He wanted to know why, if citing of the fire death of Jean Genereux was more than a handy excuse and the city was actually concerned about people dieing by fire, they were not also turning people out of apartments, houses and condos since far more people die in these locations by fire?

He stated that any digging had been done by the previous tenant and not by him. He felt very sceptical that the bridge was so poorly engineered and built that in was in any realistic (that is to say non excuse-mongering) danger of collapsing; asking why, if there was worry about a collapse, the bridge had not been shut down until a full engineering study and evaluation could be made?

He pointed out that when you have no vehicle being allowed to “…organize his personal possession to take with him.” is more B*** ***T asking “How much can you carry away on your back?”

He made the point that if the police had been there to make sure his rights were respected, they would have been arresting city employees destroying his camp. He spoke of the BC Supreme Court ruling that he has the right to set up a camp in Abbotsford and that if the City has any doubt about this they should seek the guidance of the BC Supreme Court as to the rights of homeless in Abbotsford.

His final comment was that the coverage of his illegal eviction was one-sided and all about making the city look good while ignoring the true facts of the matter.

Having now heard from the victim of City action (and the coverage of that action) I leave you to judge the action and the coverage for yourself.
Rafe Arnott, The Times
Published: Tuesday, March 10, 2009

A homeless man living along the Trans-Canada Highway was evicted from under the Peardonville Road overpass Friday morning for health and safety reasons, according to local officials.

A fire in a similar makeshift shelter on the north side of the same overpass claimed the life of Jean Genereux, 43, on Feb. 11. Police believe Genereux was trying to keep warm at the time.

Abbotsford Police and several staff members representing city and provincial agencies along with a cleanup crew cleared out hundreds of kilos of garbage, old furniture, clothing and belongings and loaded it into a moving truck for disposal.

Traffic was reduced to one lane on the overpass for several hours as the refuse was loaded and the man was allowed to organize his personal possessions to take with him. Outreach workers were on scene to address the man’s living arrangements.

Const. Casey Vinet with the Abbotsford Police described the homeless camp as “bunker-style,” and that a considerable amount of the ground under the overpass had been dug out over time.

Vinet said this led to concerns that the structural integrity of the overpass could be eventually compromised. A large collection of material had been building up for perhaps as long as several years at the site, according to Vinet.

Vinet said police were there for safety precautions and to make sure the man’s rights were respected.

Katherine Jeffcoatt, manager of corporate communication and marketing for the City of Abbotsford said, “We always use the most compassionate and respectful way of working with [the homeless] and making sure they connect with social service agencies.”

According to Vinet, the police department’s concerns echoed those of the city’s and added that “the very unsanitary conditions of the area were [also] of concern to the city – and of course police – in terms of the health of the individual.”

Jeffcoat said Genereux’s death was “a tragic reminder of just how vulnerable homeless people are in our community.”

Being Cristian requires 24/7

I find myself in a philosophical pondering mood. This is, I suspect, as a result of being driven for the past three weeks to pull the Tao of James together. The Tao being a book of stories, quotes, wisdoms, koans etc for meditating and cogitating upon on a journey for illumination and enlightenment.

The important point is that this pursuit left me in a philosophical frame of mind for viewing the world around me. It is interesting how being in this philosophical point of reference mindset changed some of the questions vis-à-vis the actions of the City and Abbotsford Police Department in their drive to render the homeless more homeless by closing their camps.

Abbotsford and Abbotsford City Council boast of being a Christian city.

However the City attitudes, behaviours and actions towards the homeless and their camps make it clear that while the City may like to claim to be a Christian city it demonstrably is not.

One cannot repeatedly treat the homeless in un-Christian ways and be a Christian city. A community that is a Christian community cannot act in a Christian manner only when it is easy or convenient; it must act in a Christian manner all the time, even when inconvenient or painful.

When a community chooses to repeatedly act in un-Christian ways it not only does not have the right to claim to be a Christian community, it is NOT a Christian community.

The broader question is about the citizens of Abbotsford and the employees of the city that carry out the un-Christian actions of the city.

Citizens and employees do not get to put on their “Christianity” one day a week (Sunday) and take it off and set it aside the other six days a week.

Tearing down and carting off the homes of the homeless is at its core barbaric and un-Christian behaviour. Anyone who engages in, aids or abets this behaviour is by their actions declaring and demonstrating themselves to be not a Christian.

Any city employee who is a Christian, in more than name only, must refuse to engage in the city’s un-Christian behaviour towards the homeless.

“I am just doing as I am told” or “I could lose my job” do not matter.

The question is “Are you or are you not a Christian, or are you one of the Christians-in-name-only?”

If you are a Christian act like it.
The same question applies to all citizens: “Are you or are you not a Christian, or are you one of the Christians-in-name only?”

If you are a Christian in more than name-only why are you allowing the city to act in this un-Christian way – as your representative? As a Christian one must act to put a stop to this unacceptable behaviour.

These behavioural constraints/requirements also apply to our large Sikh community and the other faith communities that have as part of their tenants the Golden Rule.

Being a Christian or a person of any faith is not about your words but about your actions, about living your faith every moment of your life – no matter how inconvenient or uncomfortable

Being spiritual often makes my head ache because of the philosophical, spiritual and behaviour questions it raises to be considered. A very uncomfortable and unsettling state of being. But an interesting and challenging state of being nonetheless.

In beginning to contemplate and meditate on the implications of what effect being a person of faith should have on one’s actions I find myself in agreement with G K Chesterton when he said “The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting. It has been found difficult and left untried.”