Category Archives: The Issues

Current BC election illegal and undemocratic?

The judgement that emerges from a deliberate consideration of the choices being offered BC voters in our current BC provincial election is that this election is no more free and democratic than elections in China.

In China voters “choose” from among candidates presented to them from the Communist Party.

Our provincial BC politicians would undoubtedly claim that citizens can “choose” from among the candidates and various political parties.

The problem is what, as is the case in the current election, if none of the choices offered are acceptable?

This is exactly the situation that more and more citizens find themselves in at election time and either have no one to cast a ballot for or, if they want some kind of say, are forced to vote for the least objectionable.

If citizens are denied their right to vote because there is not a candidate who they want to choose to represent them or are forced to vote for the “least objectionable” choices then these citizens have been denied their right to vote for candidates of their choice.

Therefore it follows that the current election in BC is not occurring in a “free electoral system” and thus is not a democratic process.

This is the exact position I find myself in. No party or candidates are addressing the issues and priorities I deem most important. I also find myself with serious policy differences with the positions taken by the parties and their candidates.

In a democracy one would have the option of addressing this lack of acceptable choices among those being offered by choosing to run oneself. Indeed in the municipal election in November of 2008 I was able to exercise my Charter guaranteed right to seek office and thus raise issues.

In BC my right to seek office and be heard is denied me in violation of my Charter rights, a right acknowledged by Elections BC on their own website.

Livings in poverty I am prevented from participating and seeking office through the imposition of the $250 fee required in filing the appropriate documents and running in the election. There are tens of thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands of poor and those living in poverty who are in a similar situation and denied the right to run or be represented by peers through the agency of the filing fee.

My right to run is a Charter right and I could seek to have my rights recognized and enforced by the Supreme Court of Canada. All I would need is the money to hire effective legal representation. Of course if I had that kind of money I could afford the $250 and the point would be moot. Catch – 22.

Whether it is tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands or simply me – the current electoral system violates our/my Charter rights to seek election, to be represented by peers and/or to vote for candidates of ones choice.

Thus the current BC election is undemocratic in nature. Any results arising from this election can no more be called democratic or claimed to represent the will of the people than an election in a nation such as China can.

Further, since it violates the Charter rights of BC citizens, this election is illegal and any outcome tainted by that illegality.

Friendship Garden not very friendly.

Finding myself confronted by the in your face fence surrounding the “Friendship” Garden as I parked at Clearbrook Library recalled to mind the question that had posed asking: “Do you believe the city’s $1-million Friendship Garden was a good public investment?”

Where once visitors to the Clearbrook Library where greeted with an open vista of grassy treed space, they now are confronted by a fence that is a blight upon the landscape – ugly to the point of being an eyesore.

The glaring contradiction in calling something a Friendship Garden while building a solid fence with locking gates that prevents people from seeing inside and provides the means to lock people out demonstrates once again the desperate need for a dictionary at City Hall.

Just how can erecting such a fence be construed as friendly behaviour?

I remembered the view of open grassy green space with tall shade trees that had for years welcomed visitors to the library; the gentle slopes, soft grass and shade that invited people to step off the concrete walkway and into the green space.

During spring and summer there were always individuals, families and kids taking advantage of this space to walk, sit on the grass to read, eat lunch or just enjoy sitting there enjoying the sun and breeze with the trees providing shade as needed.

The green space that, lying outside the lower (basement) level entrance, was perfect for the library’s plan to relocate the children’s section to that more spacious and open area of the library. With a pond now just outside the entrance doors that plan is scuttled since the librarians are to responsible to locate the children’s section near the pond.

Abbotsford City Hall and Council had neither the courtesy nor the consideration to consult the library, whose space they usurped, about how this space should be used. Focusing on council’s wants and to bad about the children and their needs – highly Ironic considering the children will be the ones paying for the spending excesses of City Council.

In destroying what was a people friendly green space used by people and in denying the use of the space inside and outside the lower library entrance as a wonderful children’s area city council’s actions were not only NOT a good public investment but were a disservice to citizens, children and the city.

Deplorable!

Why is it that on matters of lavish spending of taxpayer’s money for vanity projects Abbotsford City Council is bull-headed and rides roughshod over all opposition, but on matters of important public issues such as affordable housing turn into a bunch of invertebrates (1. creatures without a backbone; 2. without strength of character)?

While the recent announcement about the housing project on Clearbrook Road was most welcome, the fact that the Emerson housing project was scrapped was not only damaging but cancerous to the objective of meeting the need for safe, supportive and affordable housing in Abbotsford.

From the provincial government $11 million dollars for construction plus money for the yearly operating costs of badly needed affordable housing and City Council is not interested; but $500,000 for an unneeded garden that cost taxpayers an additional $700,000 and City Council bulled ahead over all protests.

Apparently those citizens working tirelessly to provide the wide range of affordable housing needed in Abbotsford have been going about this in the wrong manner. Obviously they should have been talking about projects in Chilliwack and Langley and how Abbotsford needed bigger and better such projects at a cost of $$$ millions in taxpayers dollars.

Unlike Abbotsford city hall where money apparently grows on trees, the organizations who in good faith put in proposals for the Emerson project have limited funds and resources.

Because of Abbotsford city council’s behaviour the time, effort and resources these organizations used in pursuing proposals on the Emerson housing project were wasted rather than spent helping those in need of help.

In future what level of government or what organization is going to want to invest time and effort in working with an Abbotsford City Council that cannot be counted on to honour its commitments?

How much more of a struggle has getting safe, affordable and supportive housing become because of Abbotsford city council’s lack of intestinal fortitude and character?