Category Archives: Issues

Help Wanted.

What do you call the recent arrest of 8 senior members of the UN gang?

An employment opportunity.

Not a pretty reality, but reality nonetheless. A reality highlighted by police statements that the public should not expect these arrests to effect drug supplies, gang activity or gang violence.

That the arrests represent an employment opportunity should come as no surprise in light of what Abbotsford’s Chief Constable had to say about the lure of the lucrative gangsta lifestyle. Given our societies distorted emphasis on money and the things it can buy as measurements of success and a key to happiness no one should be flabbergasted by the scramble for the $$$ to be found in the drug business.

Indeed, given the reality challenged social and economic policies of both the federal and provincial government and our current economic recession, more and more heretofore honest citizens will find themselves faced with a choice between poverty and homelessness OR involvement in drugs …. Tough choice to find one’s self faced with.

Of course if the federal Conservatives or the provincial Liberals were in touch with reality Canadians would not be subjected to the Conservatives enthusiastically patting themselves on the back for progress made toward enacting legislation to jail large numbers of addicts, while at the same time substantially increasing time spent in jail.

Removing their ideological blinders and ceasing their naval gazing would perhaps allow the federal Conservatives and/or provincial Liberals to learn from the experience of states in the United States were they have been pursuing this lock ‘em up policy for a period of time.

The State of New York (and increasing numbers of other states) have abandoned this policy.

Why? It was gutting state programs across the board and literally bankrupting the state(s) to pay the skyrocketing costs incurred in incarcerating an every increasing number of people.

Faced with either significant tax increases or spending the budget, for the most part, solely to lock people up rather than on roads, social programs etc New York did what anyone with common sense would do upon finding themselves in a hole – stop digging.

Thus it is that after more than a decade of “locking them up for long sentences” New York and other states have stopped this insanity.
A wise decision in light of the studies evaluating this policy that found the only things the policy accomplished was to make incarceration a lucrative business, to drive states to the brink of bankruptcy and to criminalize addiction (which is a physical and mental health issue).

This is the current situation California finds itself in, hovering on the edge of bankruptcy and facing the need to reduce the prison population by 70,000 over the next 18 months.

The costs of building and funding prison spaces for 70,000 prisoners were so prohibitive California was not able to increase prison cells. Faced with a deluge of new prisoners California packed its existing prisons to the rafters. Conditions became so inhuman even the Bush appointed conservative US courts ordered the release of 70,000 prisoners to reduce overcrowding.

Like a true capitalist (as opposed to a Harper Conservative pseudo capitalist) the governor of California wants to repair California’s finances by recovering at least a portion of the funds squandered on a policy (lock ‘em up for years) that proved ineffective and contributed substantially to California tottering on the edge of bankruptcy.

To save the state from bankruptcy California’s governor has called for the legalization of marijuana. Between the taxes raised and the funds saved, California would have the funds to focus on the truly important issues facing the state such as ensuring a supply of potable water.

Given the results and experiences of US states following a policy of locking up increasing numbers of people for increasing lengths of times it is nonsensical, bordering on out-and-out stupid, for Canada to pursue a policy that has proven to be pointless and costly to the point of beggaring anyone short-sighted enough to pursue this policy.

Given Mr. Harper’s behaviour to date the probability of common sense and experience winning out on this matter over Mr. Harper’s ideology approaches zero.

So it was that the media circus staged by the Abbotsford Police Department in arresting Tim Felger seemed to provide an appropriate exclamation point to emphasize the futility of current policies vis-à-vis the drugs society chooses to label “illegal”.

“Without reflection, we go blindly on our way, creating more unintended consequences, and failing to achieve anything useful.” Margaret J. Wheatley

How does anyone survive …

I acknowledge that my depression is currently, as it likes to from time to time, making my life and simply functioning extremely challenging. Nevertheless I do not believe that is the reason I find myself feeling that Abbotsford’s City Song should be Gene Pitney’s ”town without pity”. Be that as it may, read and judge for yourself:

I first met Dave when I was homeless myself and he was attending and graduating from the R.I.T.E. program at Triangle Resources. Over the years since then I have spoken to Dave sometimes frequently, sometimes infrequently. Over that period he suffered the ups and downs of many of the homeless as they struggle with life and drugs while falling in and out of housing – good, bad and ugly housing.

The one thing that never changed over the time I have know Dave is my evaluation that what he needed to do well, perhaps even thrive, was pro active supportive housing.

Finding oneself forsaken to the streets has health consequences that are costly for the medical system and all too frequently fatal for the homeless.

I ran into Dave last night pushing his loaded shopping cart along and he was looking far too gaunt. It seems that he was recently told that cancer has reduced his life expectancy to a matter of weeks. And our government and our (laughable) social safety net still have left him living on the streets and pushing his cartload of meagre possessions around Abbotsford.

Then there is the case of the gentleman whose camp the City of Abbotsford and Abbotsford Police Department felt compelled to destroy, leaving him without shelter on what was perhaps the coldest night of last winter during the coldest spell of weather of said past winter.

Since beggars cannot be choosers, especially where shelter during a killer cold snap is concerned, the gentleman in question ended up finding shelter in a crack house – ironic in that he was not a drug user.

I heard today that the police were seeking him in connection with or as a result of his involvement with that crack house. Ah yes, the criminalization of homelessness – even more fun than harassing the homeless even though they have nowhere to go.

Now I have no doubt both the City and Abbotsford Police will beat their breasts and claim it is not their fault because of … whatever rationalization they decide to lay claim to. Notwithstanding their claims of non-culpability, if you start a boulder rolling downhill you bear accountability for what gets smashed when it reaches the bottom of the hill.

Then there is the kid, yes he is twenty but he is still a kid, who is hyperactive, has the attention span of a gnat, and has mental challenges and the challenges that arise from his upbringing. All of which make him a handful and a challenge (OK pain if the butt) to deal with.

However the reality of his situation is that he is not capable of functioning well enough to jump through all the hoops the system imposes on his own, he is literally his own worst enemy and he needs to be in supportive housing if he is to have any chance of a life.

Getting this young man into the housing and connected with the services and programs he needs is time intensive. In other words somebody somewhere in the system needs to invest the hours, more likely days, to get him properly connected since he is not capable of going and doing what needs to be done on his own.

On this subject, I told one of our Liberal candidates at the candidates meeting at Community Services on poverty that if the Liberals were re-elected and ever really wanted to actually reduce homelessness etc to call me. I also stated that programs need to be outcome focused rather than focused on generating nice, but meaningless, numbers.

For example: If you add up all the numbers cited by various organizations in Abbotsford for the numbers of homeless housed and those gotten into treatment you will find that we not only do not have any homeless or addicts on our streets, we have negative numbers of homeless and addicted on the streets. A very neat trick you must agree.

Numbers, without being in the context of outcomes, are for the most part meaningless in determining whether a program is actually accomplishing, or contributing to accomplishing, the goal or desired results.

Catch twenty-two for the young man. Even if people were not avoiding or refusing to deal with him because of the challenges he represents, they would not be investing time and effort on one human being when that time could be used to take actions that would generate lots of nice numbers to cite to justify the program.

Because he is hard to deal with as a result of his personal challenges and that it would require a large investment of one on one time, the young man finds himself on his own, effectively abandoned to the streets.

With his personal challenges the consensus on the street is that he is going to end up victimized, beaten or dead or in jail unless he gets the help he needs delivered in the way he needs. It should be about what he needs, not about the convenience of those charged with delivering services.
Three individuals whose paths have crossed mine in the last twenty-four hours and you need care, One of whom I witnessed nice words spoken and undertakings made on behalf of, which remain mere words. All the fancy words and undertakings are worthless unless they are turned into actions.

Three people: the dying, the criminalized and the likely dead or criminalized. Is it or is it not fathomable why the Gene Pitney song lyrics run through my mind when I reflect on the situation each of these gentleman finds himself in?

No, it isn’t very pretty what a town without pity – Can do.

Judge not …

It was good to read Mr. Herar’s column and see that his impending move to the Times had been accomplished. Lamentably less judgement and more understanding are greatly needed commodities in Abbotsford.

Speaking of less judgement, Mr. Herar’s assumption that “you guys” equates to “Indo-Canadians” and that his friend’s remarks were racist in nature was judgemental and not necessarily true.

Given the Christian bent of Abbotsford “you guys” could have been referring to Non-Christians since, as anyone who has ears to hear knows, it is these Non-Christian hell bound sinners that are responsible for the moral failings in our community.

Alternatively “you guys” could have been broadly referring to any peoples with different cultural behaviours and language. Fear of the “different” or of change is not unusual in members of the dominant culture and is often expressed in intolerance. It is not necessarily race related – just ask French Canadians.

Mr. Hear’s friend may simply be a xenophobe and not necessarily a racist or guilty of racist remarks.

The point I endeavour to make is that, whether it is Mr. Herar or his friend doing the judging, making judgements based on ignorance and assumptions (you know what they say about assume – it makes an as out of u and me) is the foundation upon which prejudice in all it’s virulent forms is built.

An open mind and spirit of being non-judgmental is what allows for understanding and leads to a community being enriched in a manner that only Diversity can enrich a community.

Ironically prejudice does not discriminate, being glad to take root in any closed mind.

When I was moving from homelessness into my current home-space I was inundated with horror stories on Indo-Canadians, especially as landlords. This flood of prejudice was a result of the fact I was moving into a predominantly Indo-Canadian neighbourhood and my landlords were Indo-Canadian.

What appalled me was not so much the prejudice as the ignorance shown by the stories and statements. One of the lessons that life has taught me is that people are people. In any group (language, religion, culture, subculture etc) you will fine the good, the bad and the ugly.

Eighteen months latter I am living in the same place, my landlords are good people (hopefully they think I am a good tenant), it is a nice neighbourhood with good neighbours. My biggest regret … well beside the fact that my landlords and neighbours are not aliens from Vulcan, Bajor, Betazed, Gallifrey etc … is that I do not speak Punjabi which limits my understanding and ability to understand and explore the richness of the Indo-Canadian culture.

Incongruously, prejudice is as happy to take root in the minds of those who are at the bottom of the pecking order, treated with contempt and victims of prejudice and stereotyping themselves; evidenced by the fact that many of the horror stories I was told about Indo-Canadians as landlords were by that disdained group – the homeless.

Recent letters in the local papers about the affordable housing project on Clearbrook Road have dredged up memories of attending the community witch hunts late last year on the proposed Clearbrook and Emerson sites.

As one of “Them” it was made clear that I was unfit to associate with the people of those neighbourhoods. That being one of “Them” I was a slobbering, mindless beast, a threat to man, woman and child. Worse, I (we) posed a threat to their Things, their possessions.

In a virtuoso demonstration of ignorance, closed minds, unreasonable fear, ego-centrism, prejudice and intolerance the mob made it very clear that as far as they were concerned every one of “Them” should be sent off, preferably to a leper colony in a remote and distant location.

Why, the very presence of “Them” would bring about the destruction of their neighbourhoods. Although I do concede that the presence of “Them” in the neighbourhood could indeed have posed a threat to their dogmatism.

The ignominy of it all left me with a bad taste in my mouth and highly insulted.

Mr. Herar should count his blessings. As one of “those guys” he is still acknowledged to be a human being. It could be worse. He could be one of “Them”, one of the inhuman beasts to be shunned.

Fortunately for me, the recommendation of someone who actually knew me was good enough for my Indo-Canadian landlords to rent to me, even though I was of a different culture and – gasp – one of “Them”.