Monthly Archives: March 2007

Homeless

"Olympic" evictions declared illegal

Leave a comment

March 19, 2007

Vancouver – Pivot Legal Society and a coalition of advocacy groups won two low-income housing eviction- and rent-increase cases for residents of one of the Downtown Eastside’s low-income hotels today.

Two residents of the Golden Crown Hotel received notice today from the Residential Tenancy Branch that their illegal eviction notices and rent increases linked to the Olympics were set aside.

“We are pleased to be part of a process that set aside these flawed eviction notices and rent increases,” says Shabnum Durrani of Pivot Legal Society who was counsel for the tenants. “However, this is a short term solution. The only real solution is for government to reinvest in social housing.

”The eviction notices given were for March 31, 2007, to the 28 units in the Golden Crown Hotel located across the street from the Woodward’s building. The eviction notices and rent increases are linked to the 2010 Olympics as owners of the hotel have indicated that they would like to use the hotel to provide housing to Olympic workers rather than the current residents.

In setting aside the illegal eviction notice, the dispute resolution officer in the case wrote, “the ‘Notice’ given by the landlord is not an ‘effective’ Notice because it is not in the approved form and it is fatal in its deficiency because it does not inform the tenants of their [rights]…I find the ‘Notice’ given by the landlord is void from the beginning.”

The Golden Crown hotel was one of the four hotels scheduled to close to low income individuals in the last four weeks. As a result of the work done by Pivot and several other advocacy groups including the Downtown Eastside Residents’ Association and the Save Low Income Housing Coalition, three of the four hotels have remained open and operating for low income individuals.

Earlier today 46 single room occupancy (SRO) hotel rooms were saved when the new owners handed management of the Carl Rooms to a local non-profit organization. Community advocates, including David Eby from Pivot Legal Society, convinced a partnership of developers, 0773477 B.C. Limited, to turn over management of their recently-purchased SRO to Atira Property Management, a non-profit property management organization. Atira is a Vancouver-based company that operates three other low-income buildings in the Downtown Eastside. The owners’ agreement with Atira includes plans to renovate and improve the building, while it remains at rent levels accessible to those on basic social assistance.

Homeless, Municipal, Provincial

Recycling schools to meet community Needs.

Leave a comment

I read in a local newspaper that the provincial government actually has a program that will give a grant to study whether cooperation between a school (Yale) and local recreation (ARC) would prove beneficial to local recreation programming. Then the program will pay for capital improvements to need to advance the cooperation.

Does this concept seem as inane to others as it does to me? How could access to Yale school fail to be of benefit to recreation programming? Gymnasiums, change rooms, classrooms etc, open up a wide array of possibilities for programming. The fact is that in the town/small city I grew up in schools were used for a wide range of community activities after school hours thus saving the taxpayers the expense of building facilities when school buildings, with a little creative thought, could serve the community for many purposes. Save the taxpayers putting up two buildings where one could be made to serve double duty. Georgetown, Saskatoon, Toronto, Edmonton; in all these cities I participated in programs making use of school gymnasiums and classrooms at substantial savings to taxpayers wallets.

Unfortunately Abbotsford has the Parks & Recreation Empire and the School Board Empire and we all know that empires are about building up your empire and power by increasing the buildings and workers you control then protecting your empire against any invaders.

Now I do like the concept of the provincial government funding of capital changes that would enhance usage of school buildings for community purposes. I like the idea of funds available to draw up the plans for what changes would permit maximum usage of existing school buildings for community use. I do think that we need to look beyond merely Recreation to include seniors, clubs etc.

I suppose what disturbs me about this matter is the implication that our school buildings are not part of the community outside of providing schooling. Recent articles on the proposed school closures reinforced this apparent division between community and school district. The implication in the words of the school district is that the schools are the property of the school district, not the community. If the school district can use them fine, but if they are of no use to the school district they will be sold to benefit the school district. As if it was not the community that paid for the facilities and that the community does not have a right to use closed facilities if there is a need, especially a pressing need.

We do have a pressing need for one of the empty school buildings, preferably Abbotsford Elementary, because of a total lack of leadership at Abbotsford City Hall, which has chosen to procrastinate rather than take action on homelessness and its associated social issues. Dragging their feet on this matter has allowed these problems to worsen to the point they are on the verge of exploding out of control.
They frittered away time that should have been spent planning and preparing to address the overwhelming need for shelter in this city to the point we are on the point of finding ourselves in a position of having to act NOW to provide some form of shelter and services for the homeless, or of living with them spread throughout the neighbourhoods of the city.

Abbotsford Elementary and other school buildings exist, better yet are designed to withstand the depredations of children. Abbotsford Elementary located where it is offers the best location for providing the homeless with shelter while maintaining their access to the services they need and has the potential for the least disruption on the neighbourhood adjacent to the school. Hopefully we can engage the community spirit shown on the question of closing Philip Sheffield to work with the neighbourhood to minimize disruptions, deal with problems and maximize our ability to begin to address these social problems.

It is going to take community, from local neighbourhoods to the entire city to put in place the programs and facilities needed to start reducing homelessness rather than letting it grow. Granted using Abbotsford Elementary is not ideal, but ideally we would have had leadership on these issues and be in a much better position to deal with the burgeoning crisis of homelessness. Until we can get some leadership and intelligence into Abbotsford City Hall we are just going to have to make do with leadership from the citizens and make use of facilities such as Abbotsford Elementary.

Consider

Thoughts on Thinking

Leave a comment
I was addressing a group of geographers the other day on Abbotsford’s social problems of homelessness, poverty, mental illness, addiction and affordable housing.

I decided to use their theme of inclusion and diversity to refer to George Carlin and his bit on mutually exclusive words with inclusion and diversity seeming to hover on the verge of being mutually exclusive, joining such examples as politicians & truth.

The point was to cite this as the root of not only our social problems but of almost all other challenges facing our societies, indeed facing the entire human race.

Not politicians and their propensity for lying or acting on what their ideology says should be the situation instead of what the actual reality of the situation IS. Rather it was my postulation that for the vast majority of the human race, especially politicians, thinking is an incredibly painful task, to be avoided at all costs.

What else would explain the length people will go to in order to avoid thinking about things or outright refusal to think period?

Politicians lie is an accepted truism, born out by the evidence of their words, actions and the outcomes of their behaviours. The solution to politician’s lies and so many other conundrums is the application of tools such as Occam’s razor or the science of logic. But this would require the application of thought, in some instances deep thought, causing pain, even agony throughout the population.

So it is that people go for what sounds good rather than apply critical thinking. They cling to what they want to believe or want to see rather than what the reality is. They avoid any thought or consideration of their core beliefs or world view because that would require deep thinking. Anything to avoid the pain of thought, the agony of deep thoughts

After all, who would refuse to think about problems and solve them, rather than wasting resources accomplishing nothing and allowing the problems to worsen and multiply, unless the very process of thinking was incredibly painful and must be avoided?

ipso facto: thought = painful experience for most people

I asked them to give a little thought to the effect that thinking being painful and thus to be avoided has had on social issues in Abbotsford and Canada. I asked anyone finding themselves experiencing pain, to work their way up to thinking by merely considering these ideas, kind of thought lite.

The point of this postulation was originally to engage their interest and drawing attention to the need to get people actually thinking about the problems, what needs to be done and on solutions. It served very well to engage their attention on major social problems and the hard realities we need to really think about and face in order to make intelligent, rational, sometimes unpleasant decisions on so many pressing issues.

The reason for sharing this here is because, frighteningly, when this idea continued to roll about my mind making me think further on the postulation about thought hurting so much, evidence in support of the proposition continued to grow. So think about (or at least consider the possibility) the proposition that thinking = pain.

Asking yourself: Who would refuse to think about problems and solve them, rather than allowing the problems to worsen and multiply, unless the very process of thinking was incredibly painful and must be avoided at any cost?

Frightening thought isn’t it?