Educating Abbotsford City Hall

Annual: 1. of, for, or pertaining to a year; yearly: annual salary; 2. occurring or returning once a year; 3. Recurring, done, or performed every year; yearly.

I make available the above definition of annual for the education of Abbotsford City Hall which has, on several occasions, demonstrated their lack of knowledge as to what the term annual means.

When you have an annual fee increase you raise your fees ONCE a year and no other fee increases take place until a year has passed. It does not mean you have an annual fee increase in September 2007 following a fee increase in July 2007and then another fee increase at the beginning of January 2008 – which at a 100% was definitely the steepest of the increases.

Abbotsford Recreation Centre patrons have now (I say now as I have no knowledge of how many, if any, more annual increases will occur within the year) had three fee increases in this annum (noun (Latin) year; “per annum”). Annum: year; annual: yearly. So for the education of City staff and politicians I repeat the definition of annual.

Annual: 1. of, for, or pertaining to a year; yearly: annual salary; 2. occurring or returning once a year; 3. Recurring, done, or performed every year; yearly.

While on the topic of definition or naming of City programs etc.: Should not a swim where the price doubled be renamed from a loonie swim to a twoonie swim. It just seems somewhat loony to be paying a twoonie for a loonie swim. I do not imagine taxpayers/patrons find it at all amusing to go to a loonie swim and be charged $2. To stand in front of that flat, big screen TV mockingly labelling the swim costing you $2 a loonie swim.

As a final point on paying attention to the details: With Parks and Rec having taken over the public bulletin board for the stated purpose of promoting Parks and Rec programs; why did they then have to spend all those taxpayers dollars on two big flat screen TVs to hang at the front desk? Simply because, as is the case with their multiple “annual” fee increases, they can?

Internment Camps?

Internment Camps?

Watching the news during the first weekend of February was disquieting, raising questions and concerns about the Campbell government’s ability to address homelessness, mental illness, addiction, poverty and poverty reduction not only in a suitable but a just way. I was also left with serious doubts about the government’s capability to deal with these issues in an effective and fiscally responsible manner.

Two years ago I wrote that if the Campbell government continued to suffer from a lack of ideas, leadership and some boldness they would be digging in the archives for the old plans to the World War II camps used to intern Canadians of Japanese ethnicity.

No leadership, no ideas, no innovation, no boldness and you find time ticking away creating political pressure to DO SOMETHING! Anyway of rounding up the homeless and getting them out of sight before the eyes of the world turns to BC for the Olympic Games in 2010 begins to look tempting.

Sounds a little farfetched?

Until you have Health Minister George Abbots talking about reopening Riverview to begin getting the homeless mentally ill of the streets and interned out of sight. Of course this is for “their own good”. Given the number of homeless estimated in the report for mental health it is clear that just Riverview could not house all 15,500 homeless. You would have to find other “accommodation” for the balance.

The government did talk about using old prisons or other such facilities in the interior as places to set up residential programs that would help people get a trade and ready to get back into society, “for their own good”. I heard the other day about just such a two year program running right now although of very limited space.

You would have to come up with some sort of plans for camps to house the residents of a program expanded to 15,500. Perhaps the archives …

Politicians, political pressure and political expediency have me remembering the caution that “the road to hell is paved with good attentions”.

The government’s plans to look at reopening Riverview to house the homeless “for their own good” is a plan to step onto a very steep, very slippery slope. It is a slope that as someone who has suffered homelessness and mental illness fills me with disquiet and foreboding.

Up to 15,500 Homeless: Report

Tally of BC homeless by health profs far higher than housing minister’s.

View full article and comments here http:///News/2008/01/31/MoreHomeless/

By Andrew MacLeod

Published: January 31, 2008

TheTyee.ca

The number of homeless people in British Columbia may be triple the estimate Housing Minister Rich Coleman provided to The Tyee last week, according to a new report by health professors at UBC, SFU and the University of Calgary.

In B.C. there may be as many as 15,500 adults with severe addictions or mental illness who are homeless, says the 149-page report, Housing and Support for Adults with Severe Addictions and/or Mental Illness in British Columbia. The report is dated October, 2007, and was released to The Tyee on Jan. 30, 2008.

The authors are SFU’s Michelle Patterson and Julian Somers, Calgary’s Karen McIntosh and Alan Shiell, and UBC’s Jim Frankish. The report was prepared at the request of the health ministry’s mental health and addictions branch. Other partners and contributors to the report include the provincial health authorities, the Employment and Income Assistance Ministry and Coleman’s own Forests and Range Ministry.

To get their estimate, the authors used data and reports from the Canadian Mental Health Association, the Canadian Senate, the provincial government and academic journals. “No single authoritative source of information is available to derive these estimates,” the report says. “However, a number of recent reports offered valuable insights into various levels of housing need.”

Many at risk

The report says some 130,000 adults in B.C. have severe addictions and/or mental illnesses. About 39,000 are “inadequately housed,” meaning they meet the Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation’s definition of being in “core housing need.” Of those, about 26,500 don’t have enough support to help them stay in their home.

Somewhere between 8,000 and 15,500 are what the report calls “absolutely homeless,” meaning they are living on the streets, couch surfing or otherwise without shelter. The report says the authors confirmed their figures with “local stakeholders and key informants.” The report also says that despite impressions that homelessness, mental illness and addiction are urban problems, interviews with front-line workers found the same problems were “highly prevalent in rural settings.”

The report’s number—which includes only people with severe addictions and mental illness -— far exceeds the figure used by Forest, Range and Housing Minister Rich Coleman. Last week he said there are between 4,500 and 5,500 homeless people in B.C. at any given time. He said the figure came from BC Housing. The agency told The Tyee it based its estimate only on the communities that have done official homelessness counts.

NDP housing critic David Chudnovsky called Coleman’s number “bogus.” His own “conservative” estimate of 10,500 homeless in the province was made last fall based on homeless counts and numbers provided by shelters and other aid agencies.

High cost status quo

While creating supported housing for everyone at risk of homelessness would be expensive, the authors found the cost of doing nothing is even higher.

“If we focus on the absolutely homeless, non-housing service costs amount to about $644.3 million per year across the province,” says the report. That includes the costs to the health care and prison systems as well as emergency shelters. “In other words, the average street homeless adult with SAMI [severe addictions and/or mental illness] in B.C. costs the public system in excess of $55,000 per year.”

Providing adequate housing and supports would cut those costs by $18,000 per person each year, it says, saving about $211 million in annual spending.

The authors note they did not include the amount of money that homelessness may cause to be lost by businesses, tourism and cancelled conference or convention bookings. The report says, “The inclusion of these and other cost drivers would further enhance the case for change.”

‘Key actions’ suggested

The report offers a dozen “key actions” that need to be taken to provide housing and support to people with severe addictions and/or mental illness. They include:

  • Adopting a “housing first” policy providing permanent, independent homes to people without time limits or requiring residents to get addictions treatment.
  • Creating more multidisciplinary treatment teams such as the Assertive Community Teams set to launch Jan. 31 in Victoria. The teams are needed to reach the “hardest to house” and get them better access to services and treatment.
  • Taking a “harm reduction” approach at housing facilities and accepting the use of drugs and alcohol on-site.
  • Creating more affordable housing and protect the affordable housing that already exists.
  • Continuing efforts to make it easier to apply for and receive welfare.
  • Hospitals and prisons should set policies so they no longer discharge people with “no fixed address” without knowing where they will go. “No one should be discharged from an institution directly to the street or a shelter without prior arrangement and follow-up.”

Finally, the authors recommend immediately building or creating supported housing for the 11,750 or so people with severe addictions and/or mental illness who are already homeless. The number likely underestimates the need, they write, and should be taken as a starting point.

BC Housing’s current goal falls far short of the need. The agency’s most recent service plan says 1,462 new units of supported housing for homeless people will be added by 2009-2010.

“Without adequate housing and support, people with SAMI who are homeless often cycle through the streets, prisons and jails, and high-cost health care settings such as emergency rooms and psychiatric inpatient units,” the Health Ministry’s report says. “This is ineffective and costly in both human and financial terms.” With help, it adds, they can stay in stable housing. “It is time to implement these evidence-based solutions for British Columbians in need.”

Related Tyee stories:

Andrew MacLeod is The Tyee’s Legislative Bureau Chief in Victoria. You can reach him at amacleod@thetyee.ca.