\u201cWelcome to the club\u201d crossed my mind while reading \u201cMayor George Peary responded quite curtly to my e-mail that this fee will generate $125,000 and “if you have any suggestions for additional revenue sources for the city or recommended cuts in city services for 2010, we would like to hear from you.”\u201d in a letter to the editor.<\/p>\n
The letter writer joins a growing list of citizens dissed by Mayor Peary and City Council for daring to suggest that Abbotsford\u2019s Council live within its means.<\/p>\n
Further, while I have no doubt Mayor Peary would love to hear suggestions for additional revenue sources that would permit City Council to continue its financially irresponsible spending ways; I do doubt, based on council\u2019s actions in searching for new ways to divert taxpayer\u2019s money into City pockets rather than the prudent fiscal behaviour of reducing spending, Mayor Peary or Council having any real desire to hear suggestions on spending cuts.<\/p>\n
City Council did not cut one single dollar from the budget for this current year. Any \u2018phantom cuts\u2019 they claim to have made were only reductions of proposed spending increases. Any suggestions made during the budget process that Council cut spending in order to begin living within their means, were either ignored or, as in the case of the Abbotsford Ratepayers Association, publically scorned.<\/p>\n
Focusing only on feeding Councils insatiable appetite for spending leads to a mindset where, when questioned on imposing user fees on sports fields, Mayor Peary focused on \u201c\u2026 this fee will generate $125,000\u201d rather than the truly important consideration \u2013 the devastating effect these extra fees will have on many young sports players ability to afford to participate.<\/p>\n
Especially in these economically tight times when so many are forced to count how every penny is spent \u2013 except it seems, Abbotsford City Council.<\/p>\n
A significant portion, if not all, of the money that the fees will raise could have been saved by the simple action of not spending the tens of thousand of dollars the city is spending to replace what was a perfectly good sign in front of the Abbotsford Recreation Centre, with an electronic sign. The old sign would have served fine until such time as the city\u2019s financial house was in order.<\/p>\n
But then, why should Council be expected to behave responsibly when the sign was shiny and bright and new and required spending taxpayer\u2019s money?<\/p>\n
Behaviour that holds little hope of this Council getting Abbotsford\u2019s financial house in order; behaviour that leaves informed taxpayers shuddering at the thought of how wasteful and costly to the taxpayers Council\u2019s spending will become if they ever get their greedy hands on a gasoline tax as a revenue source.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u201cWelcome to the club\u201d crossed my mind while reading \u201cMayor George Peary responded quite curtly to my e-mail that this fee will generate $125,000 and “if you have any suggestions for additional revenue sources for the city or recommended cuts in city services for 2010, we would like to hear from you.”\u201d in a letter to the editor. The letter writer joins a growing list of citizens dissed by Mayor Peary and City Council for daring to suggest that Abbotsford\u2019s Council live within its means. Further, while I have no doubt Mayor Peary would love to hear suggestions for additional revenue sources that would permit City Council to continue its financially irresponsible spending ways; I do doubt, based on council\u2019s actions in searching for new ways to divert taxpayer\u2019s money into City pockets rather than the prudent fiscal behaviour of reducing spending, Mayor Peary or Council having any real desire to hear suggestions on spending cuts. City Council did not cut one single dollar from the budget for this current year. Any \u2018phantom cuts\u2019 they claim to have made were only reductions of proposed spending increases. Any suggestions made during the budget process that Council cut spending in order to begin living within their means, were either ignored or, as in the case of the Abbotsford Ratepayers Association, publically scorned. Focusing only on feeding Councils insatiable appetite for spending leads to a mindset where, when questioned on imposing user fees on sports fields, Mayor Peary focused on \u201c\u2026 this fee will generate $125,000\u201d rather than the truly important consideration \u2013 the devastating effect these extra fees will have on many young sports players ability to afford to participate. Especially in these economically tight times when so many are forced to count how every penny is spent \u2013 except it seems, Abbotsford City Council. A significant portion, if not all, of the money that the fees will raise could have been saved by the simple action of not spending the tens of thousand of dollars the city is spending to replace what was a perfectly good sign in front of the Abbotsford Recreation Centre, with an electronic sign. The old sign would have served fine until such time as the city\u2019s financial house was in order. But then, why should Council be expected to behave responsibly when the sign was shiny and bright and new and required spending taxpayer\u2019s money? Behaviour that holds little hope of this Council getting Abbotsford\u2019s financial house in order; behaviour that leaves informed taxpayers shuddering at the thought of how wasteful and costly to the taxpayers Council\u2019s spending will become if they ever get their greedy hands on a gasoline tax as a revenue source.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20,54],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1399","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-municipal","category-snafu"],"yoast_head":"\n